Time management college essay

How important is time management? The use of our time should be in charge of the importance of our activities and goals, that is why we must come to the realization that time is our most important resource, is the most valuable and precious we have. It is perishable, can not be replaced, nor can it be saved. The only thing we can do with it, is to decide how it will be used. If we appropriately consider our goals and activities, and we carry them out in order of importance, we will have made a good one of our time because we will always go to what is most important, although for this we must sacrifice those of lesser importance. One of the first steps in time management is the planning of activities, a schedule will be assigned to all activities with the use of a personal agenda which will give us an advantage of an overview of the totality of the workload Or activity to be performed. You can also make a daily list of activities where depending on our matrix of activities you can change the importance that will be given to each activity to perform.
When talking about efficiency and effectiveness essential parts of time management you can talk about

who told us that “efficiency is the correct utilization of available resources” and Efficiency “is as a measure of achievement of results.” But what is said is that effectiveness is more important than effectiveness.
Because the goal must be the achievement of objectives, not simply that the person is busy. Very often people quickly because they think they are not going to make trouble, but the reality is that when people work fast and under pressure they make more mistakes, that is why today you can say that working faster and working more hours are Poor strategies to manage time.

Essay on Charles Life

The reign of those known as Reyes Catholicons went down in history for two main reasons: the discovery of America and the Recon quest of the peninsular territories to the Arabs. This recon quest went much further, since until now, Spain was a set of different independent kingdoms that under the reign of Isabel and Fernando were united under one same crown, at least legally. Queen Juana, heiress of the kingdom of Castile, suffered mental problems and was separated first by her husband and then by her father, all her life in Tordesillas. His son was in charge of inheriting a poisoned candy, a country that was not as close as it seemed and that he was certainly not the person to stabilize, at least a priori.

To make this affirmation I rely on all the problems Carlos I had to get recognized as heir to the throne. One of those reasons is that it showed little knowledge about the country and its customs, but what is worse, did not show a real interest in knowing it. He was educated in the court of Hapsburg in contrast to his brother Fernando, who grew up with his maternal grandfather in Spain and was considered the ideal person to inherit the throne because he was one of his own. It did not help at all that when the young monarch arrived in Spain he would not be able to speak his language fluently and would endeavor to be accompanied by nobles and Flemish advisors who felt superior to the Spaniards and were arrogant.

There was also the fear that the foreign king decided to expel the riches of the Spanish kingdom taking them to his court of Hapsburg, reason why was forced to sign an agreement by which it could not take anything of value of the country. Obviously, he was considered someone from the outside who did not deserve confidence and who could only expect tricks and trickery to steal gold from America.

Last but not least, the injustices committed against his mother, Juana I, were known by all the people who professed great affection for their “crazy” queen. Juana had first been despised by her husband, who did not hesitate to be often unfaithful, a normal thing at the time since it was a political marriage. But she, really in love with young Felipe, suffered greatly for that reason and her love story filled the town. Later, her father declared her officially mentally ill to detain her and remove her from her rights to the throne, and her son, although he reigned with the mother officially, also ignored her and kept her in her confinement. For this reason he was forced to give his word that the mother would receive a better treatment than he had among the conditions that he should have accepted to obtain the kingdom of Aragon.

Little respectful of Spanish customs, contemptuous of the nobility of the country and clearly considered a bad son, Carlos I had all the ballots to be hated by his people. Poorly advised from the outset by his advisers, he did not know how to start his career in Spain with a good foot, which almost made his brother’s supporters succeed in turning him into an heir, which was also the wish of his grandfather Fernando. Only great diplomatic work and long negotiations managed to put on his head the one that was the first crown that united all the kingdoms of Spain in the same person.

Essay on the life of Karl Marx

He was born into a wealthy family. His father was a Jew converted to Protestantism. He studied at the University of Bonn, but his radical ideas, inspired by Hegel’s theories, interested him much more than a law degree, a branch imposed by his father. The latter, in an attempt to put his son in charge, forces him to move to the much stricter University of Berlin, but his political militancy continues. After completing his doctoral thesis, he began writing for radical journals, causing him many problems with the authorities. At the end of the newspaper he worked for he traveled to France, where he met Engels, with whom he developed a deep personal friendship. Together they develop their main economic and social theories. Faced with the impossibility of returning to his country, where he is forbidden entry, he settled for a time in Belgium, but forced him to undertake not to publish anything of political court, reason why returns to France and finally moves to London in 1849.

In this city he founded the “New League of Communists”. It survives thanks to financial help from Engels. It is in this city where he realizes his deep economic studies that will give place to his summit work “The Capital”

Marx was revolutionary even in his marriage, as he engaged with a high-class baroness Jenny von Westphalen, sister of the Prussian Interior Minister, who broke off her relationship with a nobleman to engage with Karl. Their personal life was very sad, since of six children they had in common, three died in childhood. He also had a child born of an extramarital relationship with his housekeeper.

Ideology = Marxism is based on three basic columns:

Dialectical materialism = For dialectical materialism matter is the fundamental reality, but matter is dynamic and changing as a result of the struggle of counter elements
Historical materialism = Defends that the history of the world is the history of the class struggle over the centuries: slaves against free men, oppressed against oppressors, workers against capitalist system …
Scientific Socialism = It is the term that Engels used to differentiate Marxism from other socialisms based on idealism. Marxist socialism had its basis in science. Science and economics are a whole that is understood when studying together as both are closely related.

How to Make a Film Essay

The first thing we have to keep in mind when we think about how to make a rehearsal of a movie is whether it is going to be aimed at an audience that has already seen the film or if we want it to be a criticism directed at viewers who have not yet gone to See the work. In the first case we can comment the argument thoroughly but in the second we must be very careful and give our opinion about the film but revealing as little as possible about its plot.

In the introduction of a short essay on a film we can start by commenting a couple of lines about it in general, to put the reader in background of what we are talking about and then focus the topic on the aspect that we are going to highlight of it. That is, the idea that we are going to defend in the body of the essay, for example: “it is a good movie”, “it is a boring film”, “it is a film representative of its director”, ” To the height of other interpretations of X, its protagonist “.

Of course, although that is the central idea, we must expose it in an attractive way and cause the reader to continue reading. It is not the same to say it is a good film to say: “Although it is not one of the best works of X for the reasons that I will defend in my essay, it is a great film with an unquestionable quality and that knows to maintain the attention of the spectator Until the last frame. ”


How to make a movie essay: The body of the essay

Here we will defend the theory set out in the introduction. Normally when we talk about how to make a rehearsal of a film we talk about an argumentative type essay, that is, a writing where we are going to give opinions on which we base ourselves to defend our point of view.

There is another possibility, that of being film students. In this case a more technical type of study can be carried out, which may have a more scientific approach, but since it will not be the norm when it comes to how to make a film essay, we are going to focus on what would be a classic argumentative essay .

We can support our opinions in those of renowned critics to give more weight to them. Or in articles appearing in specialized magazines. But above all we must reason our arguments. Not to say that a movie is boring without more, we must explain, for example, that it is boring because the director has not been able to give a correct rhythm, resulting too slow. Or that the actor or actress has not been able to transmit the correct emotions by performing a flat interpretation, devoid of nuances that made identification impossible with the protagonist and therefore led to loss of interest in the plot.

We must remember to put at the end of the essay where we have extracted the citations in a list of bibliographical references.

How to Make a Film Rehearsal: The Findings

In the conclusions of the essay we shall give our idea as proved by a brief summary of the most important reasons on which we have relied to defend it. We must include the idea with which we want the reader to remain. Although we may have also talked about the lighting or the interpretation of the actors throughout the essay, we can consider that the most relevant aspect of the film has been its script and plot turns.

In this case we must emphasize it in the conclusions so that the reader stays with that concept that seems to us the most important of the film.

How to write an essay?

What are the steps for writing an essay?
Select and delimit the subject: In order to initiate the search for information, which allows to theoretically support the content of the essay, it is necessary: ​​it is necessary:

Information search: select texts, authors, sources, etc. To start the documentation stage
Reading: this should be done in a work attitude; Is a study reading. At this point it is necessary to carry out the following activities:
The underline is made by locating the main ideas of the authors; Is what is commonly called abstract, which will serve to substantiate the essay contexts or phrases to the letter, between pitted.
The analysis: it consists in the classification of information, in ordering and understanding it. The synthesis: it is the most important step, since it consists in knowing how to express the ideas of the authors with the words of oneself. Having the concept, the idea is the goal of this moment and know how to express it orally or in writing, using your own style.

What should be the structure of an essay?
According to its structure, the test must be presented in a certain order:

Introduction: is the one that expresses the subject and the objective of the essay; Explains the content and the sub-themes or chapters it covers, as well as the criteria applied in the text, is 10% of the essay and covers more or less half sheet. Its specific objective is to capture the attention of the readers.

Development of the theme: contains the exposition and analysis of the same, the own ideas are raised and are supported with information of the necessary sources: books, magazines, Internet, interviews and others. It constitutes 80% of the test; Covers more or less 4 to 5 pages, although we must remember that the extension conforms according to the ideas that are developed (each paragraph is composed of one main idea and several secondary). In it goes the whole developed theme, using the internal structure: 60% of synthesis, 20% of summary and 20% of commentary.

Conclusions, in this section, the author expresses his own ideas on the subject, allows to give some suggestions of solution, to close the ideas that were worked in the development of the subject and to propose lines of analysis for later writings. They contemplate the other 10% of the essay, about half a page.

Bibliography, at the end are written the references of the sources consulted that served to gather information and to support the ideas or criticisms; These sources can be books, magazines, Internet, interviews, television programs, videos, etc.

Written essay submission
1. Title
2. Author
3. Introductory part
4. Development
5. Conclusion or closure
6. Bibliography

Remember: An essay should answer the following questions:
What is it? = General objective
How? = Method
Where? = Space
When? = Time
Why? = Justification

What is it?
When you start writing an essay it is generally believed that the information in a textbook is sufficient; However, if you want to gain more knowledge about the subject and also a good grade, it is necessary to perform a search for information.
To look for information, documentation, to investigate, is a previous and fundamental task whenever you have to do a written work; Be it an essay, report, comment, synthesis.

How do I start?
It is necessary to perform certain activities that are essential for all writing work, then we mention them so that you start your adventure in the search of information:

Focusing on the topic is the first step since you must have well-defined and delimited your ideas before you start. You can use the following methods:

Linking ideas: Organizing ideas in a diagram serves to identify and delimit the topics. Write down all the aspects of the topic that you think of and then try to establish relationships between them.

Write freely: Write about the topic for fifteen minutes, non-stop. Do not worry about the organization. When you are finished review what you wrote and delete the ideas that are repeated, then check how much information you have for each of them, this will give the guideline to know what type of search

How do I search?
Take a sheet and write the general topic in the center and around related issues or ideas. Draw lines between them, relating those you consider similar or those that, once combined, present interesting ideas. This will help you organize the structure of your writing.

Design questions related to the topic to guide your search: what is ?, what is it for ?, what aspects will I consider ?, etc. Try to answer them in writing with your previous knowledge and decide which sources you need to consult.

Start with the search from the sources you have at your disposal: Encyclopedias, textbooks, Internet, Online Libraries, Videos, etc.

Evaluate your sources

Examine the source of the information and verify that it is reliable sources. Use the following checklist to determine the degree of reliability:
Contains original studies or writings

This is a current enough source for your research.

Belongs to a recognized university or other academic institution.
If you have only personal opinions, you may want to look for another source that has solid backing.

In the following article you will find a guide to evaluate your sources of information:

Where do I look?
After having made the choice and delimitation of the topic is the time to start the search for information. Think about what you need to know and how to get the sources that will provide the most reliable and accurate information. Information sources: When you start looking for information you should consider the type of documentation you need and the place where you can find it. Here’s a list of the sites you can use:
Computer applications or Internet:
Internet and Websites
Library Catalogs
Lists of periodicals online like magazines or newspapers
Academic and scientific indexes Video and audio recordings
Public or educational libraries
Printed publications
Maps & Atlases
Encyclopedias and yearbooks
Sometimes, when searching for information, search results may be excessive or insufficient. Use the following suggestions to expand or narrow your searches and get the information you need. To narrow the search:
Use one by one the words of the search to make it more specific
Avoid looking for common words like “a”, “the”, “my”, “the”, “of” or dates as “1890”.
2. To broaden the search results:
Use fewer words in the search
Write alternative words that describe what you are looking for.

Essay on social work

How can I use epistemology within Social Work? We all know that the importance of epistemological grounding our professional work is not easy, but if we can understand social work from this vision we will have strong arms to defend our profession. From Man and his works passing through the sciences of nature, until arriving at Science and Ethics, are the subjects that diverse authors like those that I quote later … is from where arises this attempt of essay on Epistemology, diocese of the art of the knowledge , His understanding and understanding of it, it is probable that this server as an expert of epistemology will be extremely short in its analysis, since it is not possible to fully understand the way of thinking and the perception of the spirit left by the thinkers and writers Which have made foray into the subject.
We have been told repeatedly that it is not necessary for us to take a model and apply it as it is, since no problem is the same as another because users are never the same and although this is not the same problem, In the same way, since the fact that each user has a different point of view, this means that neither modes nor forms are homogenized.
So let’s review each one of them and see where they coincide and where they differ.
In what they collaborate and in which they contradict, the important thing is that both collaborate in the dignified and humanitarian treatment, as well as in the service that is provided to him in a timely and adequate way to his person.
And let him go with his problem solved, and with his experience expanded with a solution and how to get it, one more to his credit.
Historical review

Although it is true that the theory of knowledge does not exist as an independent discipline in Greek philosophy and medieval philosophy, it is no less true that both in the stage of ancient philosophy and in the Middle Ages, we find multiple reflections about the problem “Epistemology” (from the Greek word “epistemology”, which means knowledge, or “prognosis” (from the Greek term “prognosis” which also means knowledge.) In these times of philosophical thought, Problem of the theory of knowledge is inserted in the texts referring to the ontological and psychological problems. This takes place in a special way in Plato and in Aristotle.
The first imprecise boundary is that which maintains the concepts of epistemology and theory of knowledge. Social work from this vision believes that we will have strong weapons to defend our profession. From Man and his works passing through the sciences of nature, until arriving at Science and Ethics, are the subjects that diverse authors like those that I quote later … is from where arises this attempt of essay on Epistemology, diocese of the art of the knowledge , His understanding and understanding of it, it is probable that this servant as an epistemological will be extremely short in his analysis, since on four Saturdays it is not possible to understand the way of thinking and the perception of the spirit that the thinkers left behind (Agassi, Ayer, Bache lard, Cassirer, Descartes, Dithery, Foucault, Gaudier, Heidegger, Nicola, Ortega y Gusset, Plato Vellore, and Zeal.) So then I try to make an explanation by gleaning from some of them That within the generality with which it is explained does not fit exactly who is the spirit of thought and which of them.
Starting from “theory of knowledge” and continuing with thinking about objects and the subjectivity that comes from within, as if it were the spirit that man wants to understand why it works, that makes it work and so that Serves that function, who benefits, and that much. For me to see in Social Work is a tangible way of explaining that for those who explain is understood and learned, but for those who try to receive and conceive this explanation does not leave much teaching on what is explained, as you will have to experience first what you have heard And read in order to understand and understand what had already been communicated to him verbally or in writing. (A little history does not go wrong when you want to better understand where knowledge comes from) Epistemology already finds its first forms in ancient Greece, first in philosophers like Parmenides or Plato. In Greece, the type of knowledge called epistemic was opposed to knowledge called coax.
Going through the University of things its beginnings within Mexico, Latin America, Europe or any other part of the world, the University has enriched itself of the history of each one of the towns, its uses and customs, its laws and the form of Make them, their politics, and the discussion of it, the congresses and their ways of dissecting